|
|
 |
Let the
Seller Beware
In last quarters newsletter, we discussed some warning signs
to watch out for when buying a chemical business. This quarter
we discuss the flip side - what does a seller need to watch
out for when selling a chemical business? Rather than “buyer
beware”, the theme here is “seller beware”. The article that
follows describes one common situation that a seller must be
prepared for.
The buyer’s tactic depicted in the cartoon is employed often,
in one form or another. When a seller is dealing with a number
of potential buyers, one (or more) of the buyers will sometimes
come in with a high offer in an attempt to narrow down or eliminate
the competition. Later, after further due diligence but before
signing a binding agreement, the buyer then reduces the offer.
The first offer made is preliminary and non-binding, so the
buyer has no legal liability when it comes in later with the
lower offer. While this practice is legal, it is ethically suspect,
unless new information justifies the lower offer. Nevertheless,
there are unscrupulous buyers out there who will do this, and
not infrequently.
What is a seller to do when a buyer tries to reduce the price
in this fashion? The seller faces a choice: accept the lower
offer and close quickly, or bring in some of the other potential
buyers, see if they will pay more, and hope for a closing at
a later date. Is a bird in hand worth two in the bush? The initial
buyer is hoping that the seller thinks so. And very often the
buyer is right. This tactic of coming in with a high offer,
getting rid of competing buyers, and then reducing the offer
after due diligence is completed but before signing an agreement,
can be a real problem for a seller.
What can a seller do to prevent or minimize
its exposure to this type of tactic?
In an ideal world, don’t limit discussions to just one buyer
until a definitive agreement is ready to be signed.
In an ideal selling process, when a business is very attractive
and there are a number of hungry buyers, this is not that difficult
to do. The typical divestiture “auction” will involve more than
one potential buyer until due diligence is completed and a definitive,
binding agreement is ready to be signed. The buyer who makes
the best offer at that time and is finished with due diligence
signs an agreement with no wiggle room.
In a less than ideal world, however, very often a seller does
not have this kind of leverage. It could be that the business
is not that attractive. It could be that it is a buyers’ market,
such as we have today. It could be that the seller, for any
number of reasons, just wants to limit discussions to a single
potential buyer. What does the seller do in these circumstances?
In this less than ideal setting, the seller can do several things
to minimize the risk of a buyer coming in with a high offer,
then cutting it just as closing is about to occur.
- Set a tight time frame. Once a buyer comes in with
an acceptable offer, keep everything on a short leash. Set
a tight timetable for completion of due diligence and at
the same time, on a parallel path, negotiate the definitive
agreement. Letting a deal drag on after an acceptable offer
is made is fraught with uncertainty. The longer the process
drags, the more that can go wrong.
- Get a deposit. The buyer should have some downside
if it tries to reduce the price or renege on the deal. A
deposit will be an indication of the buyer’s seriousness
and good faith.
- Check out the buyer. Ask the buyer if you can talk
to other companies it has acquired, or tried to acquire.
Find out what the experiences were of those other sellers.
See what the buyer’s reputation is in the industry. Does
it have a history of playing games? Or does it have a reputation
for honesty and integrity in other transactions?
- Mind the store. This is most important. The selling
process can be very distracting. It takes a lot of time
and effort, and can be emotionally draining. If key people
who run the business get distracted, the business will suffer.
The best way to minimize the risk of a buyer trying to reduce
the price is to make sure the business continues to be managed
and grown as it has in the past. In some cases, special
incentives might be in order for key employees. As a seller,
there is no better position to be in when the buyer tries
to reduce the price than to be able to say, “Thanks, but
no thanks” and move on to other potential buyers with the
knowledge that the business is getting stronger every day
and therefore is worth even more.
|
|
|